Many times people just need advice. You don’t have to be arrested to need an attorney. In fact, securing advice from an attorney early in a criminal investigation may obviate an arrest. Investigators often lie to suspects and witnesses in order to elicit statements from them. A common tactic is to use the threat: “You can be a witness or a defendant. Which would you rather be?” Most people feel intimidated, and will often provide information that is detrimental to themselves or to another, thinking an arrest is imminent. Can the police do that? Other questions I’m often asked are:
Asserting claims of self defense, crime of passion, mistake or neglect, insanity or mental disability, injury due to natural causes or at the hands of another
Asserting parental privilege, establishing improper influence of related parties, challenging competency of a child witness, challenging medical evidence of physical and sexual abuse
Challenging reliability of sobriety tests and breath tests, introducing evidence of medical and physical infirmity, demonstrating bias of law enforcement
Challenging legality of search and arrest, reliability of drug detection dogs, requiring the prosecution to prove knowledge and possession of illegal drugs, challenging the quantity and identification of drugs
Requiring proof of intent to deprive and value of the property taken, establishing innocent acquisition of stolen property, establishing purchase for fair market value
Challenging concealment, possession, or knowledge of weapon, elimination of minimum mandatory penalty where evidence does not support enhancement, assertion of Second Amendment rights
Challenge to legality of police conduct, assertion of First Amendment rights of speech and assembly, and self defense
Challenges to the validity of the stop, including roadblock, requiring proof of knowledge that license was suspended, attacking reliability of driving record and enhancements for repeated violations